首页> 外文OA文献 >Discordant order: Manila's neo-patrimonial urbanism
【2h】

Discordant order: Manila's neo-patrimonial urbanism

机译:不和谐秩序:马尼拉的新世袭都市主义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Manila is one of the world's most fragmented, privatized and un-public of cities. Why is this so? This paper contemplates the seemingly immutable privacy of the city of Manila, and the paradoxical character of its publicity. Manila is our prime exemplar of the 21st-century mega-city whose apparent disorder discloses a coherent order which we here call 'neo-patrimonial urbanism'. Manila is a city where poor and rich alike have their own government, infrastructure, and armies, the shopping malls are the simulacra of public congregations once found in cathedrals and plazas, and where household order is matched by streetside chaos, and personal cleanliness wars with public dirt. We nominate the key characteristics of this uncanny approximation of chaotic and discordant order – a polyphonous and polyrhythmic social order but one lacking harmony – and offer a historical sociology, a genealogy that traces an emblematic pattern across the colonizing periods of its emergent urban forms into the contemporary impositions of gated zones and territories. The enduring legacy of patrimonial power to Manila is to be found in the households and on the streets that undermine and devalue public forms of social power in favour of the patriarch and his householders (now relabelled as 'shareholders' in 'public companies') at the cost of harmonious, peaceable and just public order. Such a state of affairs is not only destructive of the historic built environment of the city, especially its public parks and plazas and heritage districts, its streets, footpaths, public transport and utilities, but is directly injurious of its citizens. To address the question of Manila's private order and public chaos is to reopen the quest for the good city as the just polis. It is also to take us beyond arguments of indigenous versus colonial forms of urbanism that are mired in nationalist and modernization ideologies respectively, and it is to reject the reductive logics of globalization arguments that Asian mega-cities are but variations of American logics of urbanism.
机译:马尼拉是世界上最分散,私有化和最不公开的城市之一。为什么会这样呢?本文考虑了马尼拉市看似一成不变的隐私,以及其宣传的自相矛盾之处。马尼拉是我们21世纪大城市的主要典范,其明显的混乱状况揭示了一种连贯的秩序,在这里我们称之为“新世袭都市主义”。马尼拉是一个城市,穷人和富人都拥有自己的政府,基础设施和军队,购物中心是曾经在大教堂和广场中发现的公共会众的模仿,而家庭秩序也伴随着路边的混乱和个人清洁战争。公共污垢。我们提名了这种混乱和不协调的秩序的不可思议近似的关键特征–一种多声和多节奏的社会秩序,但缺乏和谐–并提供了一种历史社会学,一种谱系,可以追溯整个新兴城市形态在殖民时期的象征性模式。封闭区域和领土的当代气势。在马尼拉的家族和街道上发现了永久的继承权,这些遗产破坏和贬低了有利于族长和他的住户(现在在“上市公司”中重新标记为“股东”)的社会形式的公共权力。和谐,和平与公正公共秩序的代价。这种状况不仅破坏了这座城市的历史建筑环境,特别是其公园和广场及遗产区,其街道,人行道,公共交通和公用事业,而且直接伤害了其公民。解决马尼拉的私人秩序和公共混乱的问题,是重新开始了对建设好城市作为公正城市的追求。这也使我们超越了分别陷入民族主义和现代化意识形态的本土和殖民形式的城市主义论据,并且拒绝了全球化论证的还原逻辑,即亚洲大城市不过是美国城市主义逻辑的变体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号